AnalysisTrademarksFollow For companies developing novelty products, advertising campaigns, or brand-related parodies, this case underscores the importance of reviewing both confusion and reputational risks. For rights holders, it affirms that parody is not …

Background and Supreme Court Decision As previously reported, in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. 140 (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified a crucial boundary in trademark law: when an allegedly infringing product uses a …

… legal challenges, including claims of trademark dilution. It is not uncommon for … legal risks—including suits claiming trademark dilution—that are anything but funny … similarity, or consumer confusion. The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 recognizes …

… the grocery chain of infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, false designation of …

… ’s version “constitutes trademark infringement, trademark dilution [and] unfair competition.” The lawsuit …

… on five counts: trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, false designation of …

… actions fall under trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, false designation of …

… practices, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, trademark infringement, and unfair competition …

… ’s product “constitutes trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, false designation of …

… of Ohio for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, false designation of …