<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Inbox Robot: Supreme Court &amp; Roe v. Wade News</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news/supreme-court-roe-v-wade</link><description>Constantly updated news and information about a variety of topics.</description><item>
<title>John Young: YouTube a new arena for candidates</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192516735</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 18:52 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  Palin stumble and fumble on the question of what newspapers she reads, or what Supreme Court cases other than Roe v. Wade bother her, or her claim to foreign policy acumen. The chances are, however, you  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Courting disaster</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192500897</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 17:28 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  would complete the work so insidiously initiated by Reagan and Bush appointees and nullify Roe v. Wade , the 35-year-old Supreme Court decision that guarantees women the right to make choices about abortion. But there are  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Slogans not enough</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192485230</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 15:50 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  The rationale for his vote: To protect Roe v. Wade. So I doubt that Obama  ...  overturn of the infamous 1973 Roe v. Wade decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Like  ...  He indicates that his nominees to the Supreme Court will have judicial temperaments like Justices Roberts  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Full story | Comments (24)</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192473036</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 14:36 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  because they have nothing to offer. The Supreme Court has ruled; there is nothing the President  ...  more than McCain will work to overturn Roe v. Wade. It&apos;s merely something they have to pay  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Crossing party lines over abortion</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192458205</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 13:28 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  Nixon was president at the time of Roe v. Wade and took no official stance on abortion.  ...  on abortion. In fact, three of the Supreme Court justices that affirmed this landmark case were  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Wajahat Ali: Judicial Activism: Playing with the Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192454956</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 12:50 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  should we see regarding the future of Roe v. Wade ? Why is this subject, more so  ...  emotions are very deep. Right now, the Supreme Court has four justices who would like to  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Pro-Obama Catholic lawyer resigns from board</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192410165</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 04:43 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  the Catholic church in opposing torture and the Iraq war. Under a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 1973 in the Roe vs. Wade case, abortion was determined to be legal. But the decision, which overturned many state  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Lay voices are reshaping conversation on abortion</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192405739</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 04:37 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  who worked on briefs seeking to overturn Roe v Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, announced his support for  ...  Kmiecs earlier work to overturn Roe v Wade . We have been at the business  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Video - So when can I go on Saturday Night Live?</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192388166</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 01:36 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  which she could not say what news media she read, or cite an interesting Supreme Court case other than the Roe vs Wade abortion ruling. It was an irresistible target for the SNL sketch writers. In one  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Yet Another Reason to Fear a McCain Supreme Court</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192381636</link>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2008 00:45 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  to fear the possibility of a McCain-appointed Supreme Court justices, but the future of the exclusionary  ...  a McCain Court than the overturning of Roe v. Wade . The exclusionary rule is one of  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Colorado bishops correct governor&apos;s bad theology&apos; on Catholic teaching about human dignity</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192372402</link>
<pubDate>9 Oct 2008 23:51 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  abortions in Colorado. The bishops worried the Supreme Court would not hear any legal case concerning  ...  even reaffirm the pro-abortion rights jurisprudence of Roe v. Wade. Catholics are not required by Church teaching  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Follow-ups for Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192348955</link>
<pubDate>9 Oct 2008 21:47 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  in our soft little hands. Equal pay. Supreme Court. Violence Against Women Act. Making women pay  ...  Legislature passed to go into effect if Roe is overturned. Banning abortion isn&apos;t primarily about  ...  would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade because without it &quot;X number of women&quot;  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Supreme decision - Voting for choice of justices isn&apos;t way to end Roe vs. Wade</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192340781</link>
<pubDate>9 Oct 2008 21:32 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  this is of supreme importance because overturning Roe vs. Wade is at the top of the political  ...  majority opinion. Then in 1992, when the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe vs. Wade in a 5-4  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>We must battle high cost of sin</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192312131</link>
<pubDate>9 Oct 2008 19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  the sanctity of life. A day of reckoning is coming for members of the Supreme Court who opened the door to this genocide through Roe v. Wade in 1973. But here we are 35 years later in 2008. Abortion, like tobacco,  ...
</description>
</item><item>
<title>Maybe You Shouldn&apos;t Vote</title>
<link>http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=192303405</link>
<pubDate>9 Oct 2008 19:43 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
...  states are in the U.S. or how many senators there are. Few could explain Roe vs. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court ruling upholding abortion rights. &quot;Roe vs. Wade is segregation maybe?&quot; one new voter guessed. Another asked: &quot;Was Roe vs. Wade where  ...
</description>
</item></channel>
</rss>
